High School Informative Essay Samples

High School Informative Essay SamplesThere are various different types of High School Informative Essay samples that you can use for you to help you come up with some very interesting ones. There are a wide variety of formats that you can use to write a High School Informative Essay.One of the best ways is to make your own. For example, you could even create an electronic version of it. You could make it as an easy to read book.If you have the material that you have worked with before that you would like to use then you could always utilize those same resources. For example, one of the tools that is often used is the powerpoint presentation. You could also make a Powerpoint presentation that contains your High School Informative Essay.Of course, you could also engage in the current trend in making instructional materials that contain informational essays. One of the resources that is often used in making that happen is the Edtools software. You could also choose from an online intera ctive class.You could also use a resource that was developed for homework assignments. In the interest of being more interactive, you could even use a homework resource that can help you create a High School Informative Essay by yourself. This is also very popular because many students do not have the same support structure as they would need when they use a software.You could also conduct some informal research into the activities that are being done in schools around the country. It is often the case that they are more likely to conduct research into science and math related subjects. In addition, you could actually conduct some informal research into what happens at schools that do not use a resource such as that.As you can see, there are many different High School Informative Essay samples that you can utilize. It can be a challenge to find the right one that is going to work for you, but it is definitely worth a try. Take the time to gather some High School Informative Essay sa mples that you can use.

Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Literature Flashcard

Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Literature

Free Essays on Analytical Essay

The question Putnam poses in reference to social isolation and social involvement is a very debatable topic in today’s society (Burns, 12). Today there is an abundant and growing presence of social isolation in terms of social capital. Social capital is defined as participation in voluntary associations that reinforce democratic and civic habits of discussion, compromise, and respect for differences (Burns, 10). Americans have recently shown a decline in their involvement in various activities, which would be beneficial as a group, not just on a personal level. According to S. Cohen & Wills when citizens are involved in civic life, their schools run more efficiently, their politicians are more open for response, and their streets become safer. The lower the crime rates the more cohesive the community (FBI/ UCR, 1995). Social capital has proven to be an empirical concept measured on certain variables. These variables include: community participation, proactively in a social context, feeling safe and trusting, connecting with neighbors, family and friend connections, diversity tolerance, valuing life, and work connections (Bullen and Onyx, 1998). On an individual basis, social isolation can be associated with poor quality of life and deteriorating physical and psychological health ( S. Cohen & Wills). A possible source of the lack of involvement may be a product of the uprise of technology such as the Internet. Scholars have been arguing that the Internet is causing social isolation and is cutting them off from the well-needed social relationships. The Internet also proved to provide an increase in depression and loneliness (Stoll, 1995; Turkle, 1996). Although changes in labor force participation of women and divorces account for some of the decline in social participation and an increase of depression since the 1960’s, technological change played a major role. Television, an earlier technology like the internet in some ways, r... Free Essays on Analytical Essay Free Essays on Analytical Essay The question Putnam poses in reference to social isolation and social involvement is a very debatable topic in today’s society (Burns, 12). Today there is an abundant and growing presence of social isolation in terms of social capital. Social capital is defined as participation in voluntary associations that reinforce democratic and civic habits of discussion, compromise, and respect for differences (Burns, 10). Americans have recently shown a decline in their involvement in various activities, which would be beneficial as a group, not just on a personal level. According to S. Cohen & Wills when citizens are involved in civic life, their schools run more efficiently, their politicians are more open for response, and their streets become safer. The lower the crime rates the more cohesive the community (FBI/ UCR, 1995). Social capital has proven to be an empirical concept measured on certain variables. These variables include: community participation, proactively in a social context, feeling safe and trusting, connecting with neighbors, family and friend connections, diversity tolerance, valuing life, and work connections (Bullen and Onyx, 1998). On an individual basis, social isolation can be associated with poor quality of life and deteriorating physical and psychological health ( S. Cohen & Wills). A possible source of the lack of involvement may be a product of the uprise of technology such as the Internet. Scholars have been arguing that the Internet is causing social isolation and is cutting them off from the well-needed social relationships. The Internet also proved to provide an increase in depression and loneliness (Stoll, 1995; Turkle, 1996). Although changes in labor force participation of women and divorces account for some of the decline in social participation and an increase of depression since the 1960’s, technological change played a major role. Television, an earlier technology like the internet in some ways, r...

The Controversy Surrounding the law on the Positive Role of the French Essay

The Controversy Surrounding the law on the Positive Role of the French Presence Overseas - Essay Example This law, otherwise known as the 'February 23, 2005' law, was passed quietly in February of 2005, but came to prominence in the autumn when there was an overwhelming vote by conservative deputies against a bid to revoke the phrase. This touched off on a debate about whether France, whose empire ended in bloody wars in Indochina and Algeria, had learnt from its colonial experience. The trouble started in February when lawmakers quietly slipped a clause into a bill requiring schools to "recognize in particular the positive character of the French overseas presence, notably in North Africa." Some of the key players in this situation would be: President Jacques Chirac of Paris, Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin, Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy, Gilles Manceron, and Olivier Petre-Grenouilleau - a respected historian who was accused of making statements in an interview which implied that the slave trade was not a crime against humanity. (In fact, he said that it didn't constitute genocide). Gilles Manceron noted that for some historians, the treatment of the harkis exemplifies how France has basically failed to deal with aspects of its past, saying "The state put them in military camps or in isolated camps in forests, cut off from the rest of the French population. This isolation is comparable to the treatment of indigenous people in the colonies." (Gehmlich, 2006). Hamlaoui Mekachera, junior minister for veterans' affairs who is also of Algerian origin and in fact actually fought for the French army during the Algerian war, praised the law, saying it was "a historic moment for people of all origins who have been repatriated." He went on to say, "The current debate must not allow us to forget the real range of measures (the law) contains." (Geimlich, 2006). Who Wants a Repeal of the law and who Does not, and why More than 1000 historians, writers and intellectuals have signed a petition demanding the repeal of this law. "In retaining only the positive aspects of colonialism this law imposes an official lie on massacres that at times went as far as genocide on the slave trade, and on the racism that France has inherited," says the petition, which has also been signed by one of France's best-loved humorists, Guy Bedos, and a leading film director, Patrice Chereau. The principal objection to the law is

Encounter Point Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Encounter Point - Movie Review Example The issues of land and water are especially important factors since the region in which these countries lie has arid and semi arid conditions. Due to inadequacy of water, there has been a struggle concerning the control of water sources (Tesssler 67). Another factor that has contributed to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the Muslim insurgency in the region. Most attacks in the Middle East are terrorist attacks whereby Israelis face growing attacks from insurgent militias and terrorist groups from all countries in the region in support of Palestine. In response, Israeli retaliates with attacks also. This has ensured that the Palestine-Israeli conflict has persisted for years despite efforts by the international community to quail the violence. However, the International community seems to favor Israel and this has worsened the peace in the region since the Arab world feels that Palestine is being fairly untreated. Despite numerous peace accords and ventures, the insurgency seems to be rising and enmity between these two states worsens. However, those that suffer are the civilians. Most of the attacks in the conflict are directed at villages, railway terminals, bus terminals, churches, and mosques etc, where many people assembl e. This has led to death and suffering of very many civilian Palestinians and Israeli (Tessler 68). This movie is based on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, whereby people have decided to use non violent means to solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. People have decided that since it is civilians who suffer in the conflict, it is civilians themselves who can ensure that such conflict is suppressed so that peace prevails. The producers spent a total of 4 years in coming up with this documentary. Encounter movie examines the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in detail by analyzing the lives of various

Star London Hotels For Luxury Stay

Star London Hotels For Luxury Stay London offers some great 5 star London hotels so you that you can experience the capital in luxury. The Londons 5 star hotels are some of the best in the world. There are the old established traditional hotels like Claridges, and other chic, modern boutique hotels like The Hempel, there is a great choice in Londons finest 5 star accommodations. Radisson Edwardian Hampshire is one such five star hotel and is located in the corner of Leicester Square. It is a grand hotel having magnificence, elegance and comfort. Grange City Hotel is another luxury 5 star hotel, offering exceptional panoramic views of the city. It is located near the Tower of London. The London Marriott Hotel County Hall is located opposite the Houses of Parliament. It has 200 bedrooms and is centrally located to visit all the magnificent sites. The Hempel is a five star modern hotel that redefines modern luxury. Wyndham Grand London in Chelsea Harbour is another five star hotel that offers all-suite rooms. It offers stunning views of the city and the Thames. The luxury five star hotels in London redefine luxury and you can experience it. 2. Manchester Hotels a place to stay for destination Manchester by hoteltravelexpress Manchester Hotels are the perfect place for you to stay if your destination is the city and you can explore the city to your hearts content. One such hotel is the City Inn that is a contemporary custom made hotel offering exceptional quality, value and service. Another Hotel is the Place Apartment Hotel located at the Ducie Street. It has got stylish loft-style apartments having Wi-Fi, Sky satellite TV, DVD players and dishwashers. Britannia Hotel is located in the Portland Street at the City Centre, Manchester. It is housed in a historic building and is close to the shops, theatres and bars. Hotel Radisson Edwardian is located in the Free Trade Hall at the Peter Street, City Centre. It is a 5-star luxury hotel located opposite Bridgewater Hall and Manchester Central. It has free Wi-Fi, elegant air-conditioned rooms and an indoor pool with jet stream, Jacuzzi and spa bath. There are many traditional as well as modern hotels in Manchester. The hotels are styled with absolute consideration for your comfort. 3. 5 star hotels Heathrow airport by hoteltravelexpress 5 Star Hotels Heathrow Airport make a great base for exploring attractions just to the west of London, such as Legoland, Windsor Castle, the Chessington World of Adventures; or attending an international rugby match at Twickenham. You can enjoy the traditional British food in Henleys restaurant. Though the hotels near Heathrow airport can be noisy, but many hotels offer a haven of 4 star and 5 star hotels services, like the Runnymede-on-Thames, near Heathrow Airport are luxury hotels that look after your comfort. The Runnymede Hotel Spa has an amazing river bank setting and is perfect for a relaxing break or for visiting Windsor and a host of other facilities as well. Great Fosters hotel located in an estate of more than 50 acres is also a hotel of great luxuries. The Milestone Hotel is wonderfully located overlooking Kensington Palace, minutes from The Royal Albert Hall, and Knightsbridge shopping and easy access to the west end. The five star hotels near Heathrow airport give you comfort as well as convenience so that you dont waste time in the airport lounge. 4. 5 star boutique hotel London for tourists by hoteltravelexpress 5 Star boutiques hotel London for tourists brings the best comfort and luxuries for tourists, business travellers, couples, friends or anyone who wants to enjoy London. Those who want to stay in intimate and luxurious hotel properties that differentiate themselves from hotel chains or larger groups of hotels can opt to stay in boutique hotels. These hotels provide the highest level of service and amenities whether you are a business traveller or a leisure traveller or a couple on your honeymoon who wants a stylish and classy hotel. You should for once indulge yourself and book a room at a boutique hotel in London. The boutique hotels in London are mostly chic, often having unusual decor and intimate ambiance. The Stafford, One Aldwych, Blakes Hotel, the Capital Hotel, Dukes Hotel are some of the boutique hotels in London. The hotels offer the highest level of amenities as well as services and are very popular with the tourist visiting this city. 5. 5 Star hotel Hyde Park the best luxury hotels by hoteltravelexpress The 5 Star hotels Hyde Park has the best location in the world. There are many luxury hotels in London that are situated around Hyde Park for your convenience. The Sheraton Park Tower is one of them. The others are Four Seasons London, Mandarin Oriental, The Lanesborough, The Berkeley, Park Lane Mews Hotel and many more. The Park Lane Mews Hotel is located just off from Park Lane and is within walking distance from Mayfair. The Goring is also one such hotel. It is the only privately owned five star hotel located in London. The rooms of this hotel are very comfortable and luxurious. One of the good five star hotels in London is the Royal Garden Hotel. You can watch the seasons come and go from its rooms. From the uppermost floors you can view the Kensington Palace, Hyde Park, and the Royal Albert Hall. The view of the London from this rooftop is enchanting. You can watch the St Pauls Cathedral or the Houses of Parliament. So when you stay near the green oasis in London you are bound to enjoy yourself. 6. Best 5 star hotels Knightsbridge by hoteltravelexpress Best 5 Star hotels Knightsbridge is located in the street and district in the City of Westminster. It is a high profile location in London as it has some of the highest property prices in London. Some of the best hotels in London are to be found in the Knightsbridge area. The luxury hotel is the 22 Jermyn Street that is a boutique style hotel in London. Another five star hotel is the Stafford London by Kempinski. This hotel has an air of timelessness and you feel like you are staying in a country house in a central London location. It is a lavish hotel and also is warm and welcoming. It has been furnished with period furnishings and you can see antique pieces adorning both bedrooms and public areas. You can indulge and spoil yourself in this hotel as it offers all the amenities that could be needed by anyone. The ambiances of the luxury hotel in this area are truly classy with modernity. The hotels can satisfy the most discerning customer. 7. 5 star hotels Mayfair are of high standard by hoteltravelexpress The 5 star hotels Mayfair are very classy. The hotels in this area compete for high end clients and so the amenities and facilities are of very high standard. The area of Mayfair is a combination of expensive residential properties, offices and shopping areas like Bond Street, Oxford Street, Regent Street. Hotels in Mayfair are almost entirely of the four and five star standard and it has the highest densities of 5 star hotels anywhere in the world. Ascott Mayfair hotel is located in the middle of Mayfair and is housed in an art deco building that provides comforts and amenities of home and services of a luxury hotel. Athenaeum hotel is located in Piccadilly on the edge of Mayfair opposite Green Park. The rooms are comfortable and have CD player and many more such amenities. Claridges Hotel is one of the most famous hotels in London. It has a combination of Victorian architecture, art deco design and contemporary styling. Connaught hotel is located within walking distance of Hyde Park, Marble Arch and Piccadilly. It has the qualities of geniality, poise that welcomes the guest warmly. Mayfair hotels have chic, style and welcome you warmly. 8. 5 star luxury hotel for luxurious stay in London by hoteltravelexpress Most of the 5 Star luxury hotels in London are centered on the middle region of Mayfair, Kensington, Knightsbridge, the West End, Chelsea and Belgravia. The other areas though have hotels they are in fewer numbers. The Heathrow Airport has only two 5 star hotels, the Radisson and the Sofitel. The five star luxury hotels are supposed to have the highest level of service, accommodation, facilities and amenities so as to warrant being classified as a luxury hotel in London. A five star London hotel will have all the latest facilities and will be stylishly decorated. The hotel will also have extremely well trained staff and give excellent customer service. They offer such level of comfort that the guests would like to stay in such hotel again and again and even recommend the luxury London hotel to friends and family. The stay in a five star hotel would make you feel very spoilt and like royalty. Every small detail will be carefully planned, from the room service right down to the hotel lobby. The luxury hotels give you full satisfaction and comfort so that you want to return again and again. 9. 5 Star hotels Covent Garden for unique experience by hoteltravelexpress 5 Star hotels Covent Garden offer an opportunity to the visitors to experience this city from a great location. There are many five star hotels in the Covent Garden and many of the 5 Star hotels are at an affordable price. A few of the best famous hotels in Covent Garden include Strand Palace Hotel London, Citadines London and St. Giles Hotel. The hotels in the Covent Garden area have lavishly appointed rooms and exceptional service. The St. Giles Hotel Central London has friendly hospitality and quality accommodation for an enjoyable holiday. The Citadines ApartHotel provides quality accommodation for short and extended stays. The Radisson Edwardian Bloomsbury Street Hotel is a hotel that does not compromise on comfort and a commitment to intelligent technology. The Kingsley Hotel offers comfortable accommodation with quality service along with an inviting atmosphere. The Thistle Piccadilly Hotel is a perfect place to stay while at London that offers friendly service and great facilities. With so much choice you would be spoilt. 10. 5 Star concierge in London by hoteltravelexpress 5 Star Concierge in London take care of your every need throughout your stay with a service that is unmistakably the best. The concierge in five star hotels in London is remarkably knowledgeable and up-to-date about whats happening in and around London. They will give you ideas for days out and restaurant and theatre bookings, arrange a drive in a limousine, they will look after you from the moment you arrive. You can explore this exciting and vibrant city with the help of the five star Concierge team. They have their finger-on-the-pulse knowledge of London, and they can help you decide what to see and do as well as make it easy by taking care of all the arrangements for you. Whether you want to go to the theatre, a gallery, the opera or you just want to explore London, the 5 star concierge team would help you make the most of your time in the capital. You get a taste of what London has to offer see selected London events with the help of 5 star concierges. 5 Star London hotels,Manchester Hotels,5 star hotels Heathrow airport,5 star boutiques hotel London,five star hotels Hyde Park,Best 5 star hotels Knightsbridge,5 star hotels Mayfair,5 star luxury hotels,5 star hotels Covent Garden,5 star concierge

Reasoning Behind U.S. Decision to Enter the Korean War Essay

Introduction What determined the United States to enter the one of the costliest wars in the twentieth-century is a good topic for foreign policy study. There are several possible explanations as to why the United States participated in the war. The most important explanation is that the western world would be in a greater threat if North Korea won the war. Communist was considered as expansionism by the White House; hence, occupying South Korea might be a move of Communists to expand the Communist territory in the world. To prevent this, the United States needed to deter this possible threat. Another one is the United States is afraid of communist expansion. If North Korea won the war, it might cause countries swinging between Communist and Democratic to become Communist. Moreover, the domestic political situation for the Truman administration at that time was crucial in analyzing why the United States entered the war. These are the most important factors motivating America to enter the war. Des pite the profits of the entry in the war, there were some reasons preventing the United States involved in the war. Because North Korea’s invasion was likely backed by the USSR, if the United States failed to handle the situation properly, a World War III might happen; this would lead to huge loss of U.S. personal and substantial financial costs. Other than that, because China borders North Korea and China was another major Communist country, the United States intervention could lead to war with China. In this paper, I would first analyze each major reason individually for entering the war or not intervening. After that, I would put the picture together to explain why the United States eventually chose to participate in the war. Reasons the United States entered the Korean War Fear of Communist Expansion The most important factor that influenced U.S. entry into the Korean War was the USSR’s and other Communist countries’ ambitions to expand. After WWII, the White House had started to consider the Soviet Union as imperialist. The report â€Å"the Truth of Korea† implied that the United States was a free nation and the Soviet Union was intended to build a Soviet empire around the world. By considering the Soviet Union as imperialist, the United States was afraid that if the United States stood aside in the Korean War, Communist countries would take further actions to expand. For instances, China would attack Taiwan, IndoChina would overthrow France and become Communist countries, and the Soviet Union would even build communist regimes in Middle East or West Europe. The worries were likely to become reality unless U.S. intervened. After WWII, the Soviet Union consolidated their power by setting up puppet communist governments in all countries they had liberated, except Yugoslavia. Both force and politics were used to keep East European countries following commands from Moscow. Based on these behaviors of the USSR on other countries, it was reasonable that the United States labeled the Soviet Union as imperialism. Facing a country with desires to control other countries, punishment was a better choice than appeasement according to the deterrence model. If the United States entered the war and secured independence of South Korea, Communist power would be contained. Consequently, when Communist countries were making decisions of territorial expansion, they had to consider the cost and consequence of a war with the United States. Therefore, the intervention could contain Communist power and prevent potential wars from happening. Fear of Bandwagoning The second important reason U.S. entered the Korean War was fear of bandwagoning. It was less important than fear of Communist expansion is because bandwagoning would not directly harm U.S. interests, but would impair the global political leadership of the United States. In the setting of post-World War II, the world was separated as two major political spheres, one Soviet-led and the other U.S.-led. The Korean Peninsula was one of the several places two the major political powers conflicting each other. Other than that, the political landscape in East Asia was towards Communist. In China, the Communist party led by Mao Zedong just won the civil war against Jiang Jieshi’s government supported by the United States. Countries like Vietnam and Laos inclined to join the family of Communist at that time, abd overthrow French colonists. Therefore, if Communist North Korea unified the Korean Peninsula, it would make countries like Vietnam and Laos align with the USSR without hesitati on. The United States was not willing to let that happen. According to historical documents, when the war just started, Truman and his advisors believed that to falter would forfeit world leadership because of bandwagoning and Communist expansion. Moreover, in official reports about Korea situation, concerns about Democratic power weakened if South Korea fell were raised often. In 1948’s report â€Å"Prospects for Survival of the Republic of Korea,† the result of South Korea lost to North Korea would constitute a severe blow to the prestige and influence of the United States. As a result, the defeat of South Korea would encourage more countries to align with the Soviet Union. The report was before the war, the United States already considered the bandwagoning a severe threat to UN’s influence in the world. From this perspective, in order to maintain the democratic as a stronger power in the world, the United States had strong interests in entering the Korean War. Consolidation for the Truman Administration The domestic political situation for the Truman Administration was not positive before the Korean War. In 1949, the Communists in China won the civil war against the Nationalists backed by the United States. It was painful that White House lost an important country, China, to Communism because the United States had invested tons of resources in the country, but in the end, the United States did not have the expected return. It stirred a debate of â€Å"Who lost China† in the United States. The public was more in favor of McCarthy’s opinion. McCarthyism indicated that losing China to communism was the government’s fault. Based on his analysis of the civil war in China, he believed â€Å"China hands† — China specialists at White House — plotted Jiang’s defeat, who was the top leader of the Nationalist. Therefore, at the time before the Korean War, the Truman Administration had a lot of pressure from the public due to losing China. If Sou th Korea was defeated by North Korea, the public would strengthen their belief that losing China was a government’s blunder. Hence, losing South Korea would be catastrophic to Truman’s presidency. From the view of domestic political situation, the United States entered the Korean War because the Truman Administration needed to prove its ability in protecting democratic power before losing all trust in the public. This point was less strong than the above two was because it was hard to collect evidence to support the point. Factors preventing the United States from entering the war War with China Entering the Korean War was likely to start a war with China, one of the greatest powers in the world. From the perspective of geography, the Korean Peninsula adjoins China. If a foreign military power of the United States was close to the border of China, China would feel threatened. The worry was validated after the United States joined in the war. On June 27th, 1950, after the Seventh Fleet of the United States was sent to neutralize Formosa, Mao, the chairman of China at that time vowed â€Å"Year after year unsure of when the enemy will attack us. We must repair the house before it rains.† Not a long time after the vow, Mao sent his army to the Korean Peninsula. Moreover, although China just ended its civil war and badly needed time to recover from the war, China was actively looking for a chance to consolidate its status in the world stage. In 1950, most countries in the world only recognized Republic of China led by Jiang and disputed the legitimacy of People’s Republic of China led by Mao. Therefore, Mao was eager to have a war with a strong world power to gain international recognition. The Korean War against the United States was a good opportunity for the communists to show the Mao’s China’s power to the world. For this reason, China was likely to enter the Korean War if U.S. intervened. Regarding the negative results of the war, people in the United States just gained peace; nobody would like to see a war between China and the United States. A war with China would lose many the United States soldiers, breakup thousands of American families and halt U.S. economy growth, hence lowering people’s living standards. Additionally, a war with China was also meaningless because at that time the United States did not want to defeat China, but defend South Korea. The war between China and the United States was predicable if the United States entered the Korean War. A war between China and the United states was undesirable for the reasons listed in this section. Therefore, a war with China was a big factor in not entering the Korean War. Start of World War III The entry into the Korean War might lead to World War III. A possible war with China might drag the Soviet Union into the war. If the Soviet Union entered the war against the United States, the Eastern Europe under control of the Soviet Union would also claim war against the United States. As a result, Western Europe would likely align with the United States to contain the Communist power in the world. People all around the world just tried to recover from the aftermath of World War II. If World War III happened right after World War II, the world would be in chaos again, creating another tragedy in human beings history. The big picture When the benefits outweigh the costs of a decision, one would put that decision into action. The three major benefits Unites States would have from entering the war were preventing domino effect of countries joining in Communist, constraining the ambitions of expansions/ invasions from Communist countries, and securing the domestic administration. The two major costs were an undesirable war with China and a possible start of World War III. It was hard to determine whether the benefits outweighed the costs. However, the listed costs were unavoidable if the United States did nothing in the Korean War. If the United States let South Korea fall, there would still be a war between Communist power and democratic power in the future. As analyzed in the section of fear of Communist expansion, Communist countries led by the Soviet Union inclined to expand their territories if their ambitions were not constrained. Therefore, appeasement to Communist countries was not going to stop them from behaving aggressively. Even though the United States would not participate in the Korean War, finally it was possible to be a day that the Soviet Union would eventually declare a war on the United States for further expansion. The costs would only become more significant than the costs of entering the war at that time. Hence, in order to prevent that from happening, the United States took the initiative to contain Communist power in the world. Additionally, human pride played a factor. Truman might recklessly enter the war in order to secure his status in White House. To him, protecting his reputation and his presidency might be much more important than starting World War III or fighting an undesired war with China. Hence, because of personal emotions, Truman would order the United States to enter the war. Conclusion There are three major reasons encouraging the United States to enter the Korean War. From the perspective of bandwagoning, defending South Korea could win credibility for democracy power and possibly win countries swaying between Communism and Democracy. In the view of the deterrence model, entering the war could constrain the ambition of imperialism of Communism countries. Considering the domestic political condition, intervention in the Korean Peninsula could make the public turn attention to the war instead of the administration’s failure in China and relieve the public pressure from the administration. On the other side, there were two important costs preventing the United States from entering the war. The first cost was an unnecessary war with China. The United States would not benefit directly from fighting against China and U.S. would consume numerous resources and human power in the war. The other cost was starting World War III. The Soviet Union could declare a war on Unites States if the condition in Korea got worse. U.S. decision to entry into the Korea War was made because of two logics. First, the costs were unavoidable if the United States just watched and did nothing in the war. Communist would continue to expand and finally encounter the United States for a war in the future. At that time, the cost would only exaggerate, not minimize. Second, Truman would more likely send U.S. troops to the war field. In order to secure his administration, he needed to turn the public attention away from China and prove his ability in foreign policy. The result of the war was peace between South Korea and North Korea. Judging from the result, U.S. entry into the war had a positive impact on the peninsula. However, whether the peace in the Korean Peninsula could be achieved through other ways at lower cost is worth further discussion.